Global Trust Fraud Scam Exposé | USA Media Partnership

Court Documents, Context & Related Coverage

Court Documents: 👉FTP OF COURT DOCUMENTS INVOLVING ECI DEVELOPMENTS AND OTHER POTENTIALLY ASSOCIATED PONZI SCHEMES
EDIT 9/25/2025 - PROOF OF ALTERATIONS OF ONLINE BELIZE JUDICIARY DOCUMENT Supreme-Court-Claim-No-235-of-2014 TO REMOVE CITATIONS BELOW HERE 👉ALTERED ONLINE EVIDENCE TO REMOVE EVIDENCE OF PAST FRAUDULENT BEHAVIOR
Some Key Takeaways. Supreme-Court-Claim-No-235-of-2014
1) COURT DOCUMENT REGARDING JUDGES VERDICT IN REGARDS TO JOEL NAGEL
" [64] I am not going to go through each and every way that the representations were indeed misrepresentations, but I find that each and every representation was, in a material particular, material misrepresentations done for a fraudulent purpose; and therefore I find that the alleged fraudulent misrepresentations, as contained in the Statement of Claim, have been proved.
[65] Further I am satisfied that such misrepresentations were indeed proved, to the high degree of cogency that is required in a case involving an allegation of fraud, such as in the present case, being especially a case involving fraud, indeed a sophisticated fraud by an attorney against his client, which makes such a fraud all the more heinous and disturbing.
[66] I find that the suggestion by Counsel for the Defendant that the representations were substantially true as claimed by the Defendants further proof, if you like, of the subtlety of this fraud; and the deviousness of this fraud; perpetrated in a deceptive manner. This is analogous, by way of graphic example, to a situation where a
husband and a wife are trying to have a baby and the wife has no proof whatsoever that she is pregnant says to her husband: “I am finally pregnant”. Just stating it in that way I think graphically shows and demonstrates how far from innocuous or even how pernicious the suggestion of a so-called substantial truth is, in the context of a subtle kind of fraud of this kind; as amounting to a complete misrepresentation of the probabilities.
[67] In fact I find that this kind of representation is so subtle and sophisticated, as one that could only be deftly devised and subtly drafted as contained in the letter of the 14th May 2003 and perpetrated by someone, such as a lawyer, with the kind of grasp of language which is the stock in trade of this profession; making such a fraud all the more pernicious.
[68] And to emphasize the nature of the fraud, the representations are particularly material because one of the conditions attached to the granting of the “A” Class licence was that Caye Bank lodge $3,000,000 with a financial institution acceptable to the Central Bank; and that such representation was being used to meet this
condition.
[73] I have arrived at the conclusion that the claimant is wholly entitled and has wholly succeeded in his claim and has proved that not only that there was a fraudulent misrepresentation perpetrated against Mr. Haugen but when one looks at the case in its totality, the way in which Mr. Haugen was treated, such conduct can only be described as a breach of contract, indeed a complete abuse, not only of a promoterof a proposed bank in relation to its investor; but of a client by an attorney in a position of fiduciary – which this court cannot condone in any way, manner or form."
CCJ Appeal No BZCV2022/003, BZ Civil Appeal No 25 of 2018
Caye Bank (same owners as ECI Development) has been sued by a banking institution in 2023 citing. "Cyber Fraud - Cyber fraudster posing as bank customer and giving instructions - Unlawful deduction of funds by Bank from customer account without authorization and consent - Whether bank under duty of care to make inquiries before transferring money."
Caye Bank (same owners as ECI Development) involved in RICO Fraud Allegations. COX v.MAYAN LAGOON ESTATES LIMITED et al. Cox v.Constantino et al., Nos. A12A1062, A12A1063.,Court of Appeals of Georgia, Nov. 30, 2012
The "Caye Bank Scheme," as alleged in the indictment, involved the purported sale by Constantino of $500,000 in Caye Bank stock to Cox without, inter alia, disclosing that the stock was not transferable. The indictment alleged that the "Plantations Villa Scheme" involved the purported sale by Constantino to Cox of $1,150,000 in units in the Belize Development Trust II, a security not properly registered in Georgia, for the purpose of purchasing and developing real property in Belize. And the indictment alleged that the "Plantation Marina and Yacht Club Scheme" involved the purported sale by Constantino to Cox, in violation of the Georgia securities laws, of $930,000 in interests in two entities through which Constantino was to invest in the Plantation Marina and Yacht Club. The indictment alleged that Constantino took at least some of the funds procured from Cox for each of these "schemes" for his own personal use or for the use of others.