OSC / Crypto.com / MEXC Complaint

Section 1 of the complaint file. More sections (Blockchain Evidence, Support Chats, Illegal Transfers, Laws Broken) to follow in subsequent documents.

Intro & Entities

Revision Log: REV 1.1 to 1.4 — 2025-07-29 10:32; REV 2.1 — 2025-08-02

IMPORTANT: This complaint links to the ongoing INTERNATIONAL Securities fraud investigations, as well as potential links to money laundering, racketeering, and international organised crime.
Case #: 55862
Securities Ref #: 467-540
Author notes that revealing this information may be tied to targeted harassment and surveillance and (gang-stalking).

Complaint Summary

Allegations: Fraud, Collusion, Theft, Customer Targeting, Racketeering involving MEXC and Foris DAX CAN ULC (Crypto.com).

The complaint arises from an ~$6,500 USD (≈$11,040 CAD at 1.38 FX rate) transfer of ~8.99 BNB.
The transfer was initiated from MEXC to Crypto.com (Foris DAX CAN ULC) and allegedly stolen through coordinated collusion.

OSC Registered Entity

Entity: Foris DAX CAN ULC (operating as Crypto.com Canada)
Address: #1700, 421 7th Avenue SW, Calgary, Alberta, T2P 4K9

Supporting Docs

Blockchain Transfer Evidence

Transaction: Transfer of ~8.99 BNB (~$6,500 USD at the time, ≈$11,040 CAD equivalent) from MEXC to Foris DAX CAN ULC (Crypto.com).

Primary Transaction Hash

0xa5fece5f0b357621a8351b5d0ab60dfc19cade2edbdab1e859a66286a9d8aa50
View on BscScan

Evidence Screenshots

Crypto.com “Failed” Claim

Crypto.com support later claimed the transfer of 8.99 BNB “failed.” Evidence shows the transaction was accepted on-chain, then redirected to another wallet not controlled by the complainant. Billions have allegedly moved through this wallet.

Crypto.com Support Chats

Crypto.com support allegedly provided contradictory explanations and false information about the missing 8.99 BNB transfer. Two separate chat sessions were logged and are available for regulatory review.

Chat Identifiers

Evidence Screenshots

Discussion Thread #2

Additional Notes

- Crypto.com allegedly failed to provide a valid return transaction hash.
- Support responses were inconsistent with blockchain verification.
- Alleged deliberate deception: “You cannot ‘fail’ a blockchain transaction.”
- Complaintant made support expressly acknowledge discrepancies.

Public Escalation

A Reddit support post seeking answers was ignored for 8+ days (note still no response, the law states "reasonable time for response", as no more than typically 9 days):

Speculation of Intentional Fraudulent Activity

The complainant believes Crypto.com intentionally blocked direct purchase of BNB coin within the app, forcing customers to transfer BNB from external exchanges (e.g., MEXC). This restriction, combined with evidence of lost funds, suggests possible collusion to misappropriate user assets.

Background

The complainant anticipated a significant upward breakout in the price of BNB and sought to acquire the asset through legitimate means. However, restrictions at Crypto.com limited options:

Speculation Evidence

Ethereum Transfer Used to Acquire BNB

ETH was transferred from Crypto.com → MEXC, swapped for BNB, then sent back to Crypto.com. Blockchain record shows this movement.

ETH Transaction Hash: 0x5e9dd086fc59799795b5b642a1694d7b6a4fc8cfabdabe3cbeedacb636afa857
View on Etherscan

Evidence Screenshots

Summary of Speculation

- Crypto.com restricted BNB purchase, forcing reliance on external transfers.
- Funds moved from ETH → BNB → back into Crypto.com, where they allegedly disappeared.
- Restrictions and missing funds suggest intentional fraud and collusion between MEXC and Crypto.com.

Illegal Movement of Funds

Evidence shows that the complainant’s 8.99 BNB coin arrived at Crypto.com but was then illegally redirected to an external wallet not controlled by the complainant. This wallet appears to act as a slush fund, moving billions of dollars through various exchanges.

Primary External Wallet

Wallet Address: 0xc4818ac90feA232Da07c11e972063Bdd7b1e826d

Wallet activity includes incoming deposits from multiple users and redistribution to external exchanges, including Binance, Mercado Bitcoin, and MEXC.

Venus VXS Token Conversion

Funds appear to be funneled into Venus VXS Token to facilitate laundering and market manipulation.

Massive Secondary Wallet

A second external wallet has processed over $13 billion in transactions, with flows involving Binance and other exchanges.

Multichain Portfolio

The illegal wallet is tied to a multichain portfolio (≈$14 billion), used for market movements and possibly wash trading. CRO (Crypto.com’s native token) is included in this portfolio.

Shiro Coin / Almira Wallet Deployment

Evidence suggests fake wallets deployed using Almira Wallet, tied to KuCoin and Kraken, were used to obfuscate asset ownership.

Summary

- 8.99 BNB confirmed in external wallet not owned by complainant.
- Wallet tied to Venus Token laundering and $14B multichain movements.
- Activity indicates coordination between multiple exchanges (Crypto.com, MEXC, Binance, KuCoin, Kraken).
- Evidence suggests systematic fraud and asset concealment through fake wallets and token schemes.

Unedited Investigative File for Document 1

An unedited original transcript of investigative file built for evidence with original drive links for images and videos.

*This page presents evidence and allegations based on publicly available data and personal experience. It does not constitute a legal finding or accusation.

Document 1

Document1.pdf - Requires PDF Viewer

Potential Laws Evaded & Broken

OSC Securities Regulations

Criminal Code of Canada

Summary

- OSC regulations demand fair dealing, proper custody of assets, and transparency. - Evidence suggests Crypto.com and MEXC may have misrepresented transactions, diverted assets, and failed to act in good faith. - Canadian Criminal Code provisions on theft, fraud, false pretences, and proceeds of crime are implicated. - The pattern of repeated failures, missing funds, and deceptive communications supports an allegation of organized fraud and racketeering.